www.redskinscheapshops.com

Karan Higdon , RBSchool: Michigan | Conference: BIG 10College Experience: Senior | Age: 22Height / Weight: 5-9 / 203 lbsProjected Draft Status: 5th or 6th RoundNFL Comparison: Jerick McKinnonCollege StatisticsPlayer OverviewKaran Higdon was a 3-star recruit back in 2015 when he announced his commitment to Michigan in stunning fashion. Higdon had been committed to Iowa but changed his mind on National Signing Day. Higdon’s immediate playing time was limited as he was playing second fiddle behind De’Veon Smith his first two seasons in Ann Arbor. Higdon got his chance to make a mark in 2017 and did a good job. It was thought he would have a breakout season this past year and though he did achieve 1,000+ rushing yards some consider his performance a bit of a let down considering his drop off in efficiency. Higdon has some good physical skills. I think he is your typical one cut back who if given space can take it to the house with his speed. He is tough and can be quite physical especially for a back his size. He’ll have to try and improve some key skills like vision and become better at some nuances at the position but Higdon could have a decent future in the NFL as part of a committee. StrengthsGreat athleticism and speed. Higdon was timed at 4.45 when he committed to Michigan if he can match that speed or improve it at the combine it will improve his stock a lot. Solidly built player who is tough, physical, and has good strength. With a lower center of gravity can play with impressive balance and make impressive cuts.Has impressive power for his size and can shed tackles and keep going for extra yards.Capable in pass protection.WeaknessesVision is lacking and is the big thing that is holding him back from being as good as some of the other backs that will go in the mid rounds. Sometimes he misses clear running lanes. I am unsure if you can teach a running back vision in the NFL. If he can’t improve it he will be even more limited than projected.Not very elusive, don’t expect him to make something out of nothing many times. Its usually just one cut and go and he is limited laterally it seems. Not much of a receiving threat. He could have been underutilized but other running backs on the teams got more targets. Related to the above that doesn’t make him a bonafide 3rd down option. He is likely limited to rotational work. Let’s see his work:More Karan Higdon videosHow He Would Fit On The RedskinsHigdon’s value to the Redskins largely depends on how well he tests athletically at the combine. The Redskins running back situation outside of of Derrius Guice is a bit murky. Adrian Peterson is no longer under contract. Chris Thompson has one more year left on his but could become a cap casualty if the Redskins decide to scrap together money for a QB in free agency or pursue any other high priced free agent. Not to mention no one knows whats happening with Semaje Perine who is currently being wasted and taking up a roster spot. If Higdon tests well I can see him being drafted for his speed, quickness, and physicality. As the team works to get faster players on the roster adding Higdon and having him work in a rotation and getting a few reps here and there could yield surprising results. He has the potential to rip off some big plays if he has a clear lane and he is capable of working through attempted tackles. Some of his deficiencies he can improve and while I don’t think he ever reaching starting quality he could be quite resourceful in a committee approach. To stick in the league he’ll have to improve his vision and work to get better as a receiving option but when it comes to the essentials of running the ball and picking up yardage he’s a solid option on day 3 for most teams including the Redskins. For this mock draft using On the Clock I went in with the mentality to do a scenario where the Redskins replace Josh Norman. While I don’t think it’s a given that Norman isn’t with the Redskins in 2019, there is some notion that both sides want to move on. Norman is still the Redskins best and most consistent corner, but his cap number is significant and his play has been declining. In addition he’s made clear his frustrations with the team and defensive coaching. The problem for the Redskins is if they do release Norman , they will have a massive hole in their defense. So this scenario attempts to do a mock draft in this mindset.As always you can follow along here: fanspeak.com/ontheclock/draft.php?d=fpmtcp15: CB GREEDY WILLIAMS, LSU-Williams is one of the top corners in this class and has a chance to be an elite corner at the next level. Williams has excellent size and speed and can match-up with any receiver type. He can press, man or zone coverage at a high level and should fit in any defensive scheme. If the Redskins look to replace Josh Norman, Williams would be an excellent choice to become their top corner going forward. 46: WR NKEAL HARRY, ARIZONA STATE-Harry is a big physical receiver who his listed at 6’4” 215 lbs, and has 213 catches, 2,889 and 22 TDs in his three year career. Harry doesn’t create a lot of separation with speed or quickness, but he has no issue winning tough contested catches. He is a good route runner and does a great job using his body to shield defenders from the ball. Harry won’t offer the Redskins elite speed Washington Redskins Hoodie , but he can be a vertical threat and a very good starting receiver.76: S JOHNATHAN ABRAM, MISSISSIPPI STATE-Abram is a physical safety who profiles as an in the box SS type at the next level. He’s been a two year starter after transferring from Georgia after his freshman year. Abram is great coming downfield in run support or zone coverage. He’s also shown himself to be an effective blitzer the past couple years as well. He’s solid in coverage, but mainly in the short area, as he doesn’t have great range to profile as a free safety. He should be an early starter and could fill a role for the Redskins who are desperately thin at the position now. 96: TE ISAAC NAUTA, GEORGIA-Nauta declared early this year and is in 2nd tier of a deep TE class. He’s had two productive years at Georgia, including 30 catches for 430 yards and 3 TDs this past season. Nauta is a good receiving TE, who is a solid route runner that can make some plays after the catch. He’s not an elite athlete, though should test decently well. Nauta’s greatest strength may be his blocking, making him a true two-way TE. Nauta has a chance to be this year’s George Kittle depending how he tests. He could replace Vernon Davis this year Cheap Customized Washington Redskins Jerseys , and long term take over Jordan Reed’s starting role.154: EDGE JOE JACKSON, MIAMI-Jackson is an EDGE speed rusher who has racked up 22.5 sacks over the last three years for the Hurricanes. Jackson has a great first step and he can win with speed creating havoc in the backfield. When he doesn’t win with speed he typically doesn’t win, but secondary moves and counter moves can be developed. Jackson is a good 2nd tier EDGE rusher in this class and could be a situational rusher for the Redskins to help replace Preston Smith.172: G LESTER COTTON, ALABAMA-Cotton is a big physical guard who has started 28 games for Alabama over the past three seasons, including being a full-time starter the last two years. Cotton has started at both right and left guard and has held up well in the SEC. He’s a much stronger run blocker than pass blocker at this point, but can hold his own vs pass rushers. He may never develop into a starter, but he could be a solid depth guard going forward. 207: OT DENNIS DALEY, SOUTH CAROLINA-Daley transferred in from junior college two years ago and quickly became a starter for South Carolina. He can play either tackle position, and could be swing tackle at the next level if he doesn’t develop into a starter. He’s got good size Alex Smith Jersey Elite , and solid feet that there is developmental potential. With the Redskins likely losing Ty Nsekhe, they could use more depth at OT next year.229: CB JIMMY MORELAND, JMU-Moreland is an intriguing late round corner prospect who has started 44 games at JMU over his career. Moreland has been a play-maker during his time at JMU with 18 career interceptions including 6 he returned for TDs. He’s likely still a day three prospect, but he’s started to put himself on the radar after a strong E/W Shrine Game and Senior Bowl. Moreland is pretty versatile and can play both inside and outside and might even have a future at FS. He’s a developmental prospect, but a good late round option with upside. Overview:I see this as a really good draft for the Redskins as there should be three instant starters from this group. Williams and Harry both have the upside to be top starters if not elite down the road. Nauta and Jackson both should contribute a lot as rookies in situational roles playing roughly 40-50% of the snaps. Both also could develop into full-time starters down the road as well. Deeper in this draft the Redskins grab three capable depth options with a little future potential as well.From a need standpoint this class ignores the quarterback position, and passes on finding a top starter for either the EDGE or LG holes on the team. There are risks there, but filling two holes in the secondary and adding a pair of weapons is a strong top 4 picks. What do you think, should the Redskins go corner and release Norman? Would you go corner and keep Norman for another year to really strengthen the secondary? Are you willing to pass on the QB position entirely in this class? Custom Carolina Panthers Jerseys